reach us

Request Personal Contact

We will never disclose your information to a third party. (*Required)
Posted on 02-25-2010
Then and Now: Pension Law Reforms Impact DB Funding

In the wake of the Pension Protection Act and the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act of 2008, employer-sponsored benefit plans are being impacted by what many consider to be the most comprehensive reform of pension law since the inception of ERISA. 

The Big Picture
The Pension Protection Act (PPA) seeks to bring stability to the nation’s network of pension funds as a growing number of plans become underfunded and, in some cases, unable to meet their pension obligations. At the core of PPA is a host of new rules imposing stricter funding requirements for both single- and multi-employer defined benefit plans.

The Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act (WRERA) goes one step further, providing technical corrections to PPA — chiefly, emergency funding relief for plan sponsors. In particular, WRERA frees cash-strapped employers from having to make significantly increased contributions during a time of national economic crisis. 

PPA and WRERA affect both plan funding and administration, so plan sponsors will need to take action to keep their plans in compliance. In some cases, this may include amending the plan. 

Playing Catch-up With Funding
In general, PPA legislation requires plans to be fully funded on an ongoing basis. Less-than-fully-funded plans are required to catch up to full funding by making level installment payments amortized over seven years. 

Severely under-funded plans may be classified as “at-risk” and subject to stricter funding requirements. At-risk plans are those that were less than 80 percent funded in the preceding year, using general funding rules, and less than 70 percent funded when counting the plan’s “at-risk liabilities” (liabilities determined as though all employees eligible to retire in the next 10 years will retire at the earliest possible time). Note that plans with less than 500 participants are exempt from these “at-risk” standards.

Pre-PPA: The “funding target” for most pension plans was 90 percent of the plan’s current benefit liability.

Post- PPA: PPA sets a plan’s funding target at 100 percent of the present value of all benefit liabilities accrued to date. The 100 percent funding target is phased in over four years, with plans generally expected to meet these interim targets:

  • 2008 — 92 percent
  • 2009 — 94 percent 
  • 2010 — 96 percent
  • 2011 — 98 percent (100 percent thereafter)

Post-WRERA: Under-funded plans enjoy significant relief under WRERA. The act includes a provision allowing plans that fall below the set target funding percentage for any year to elect to retain the same target and not jump to 100 percent. For example, plans that were less than 92 percent funded in 2008 would have their shortfall estimated relative to 92 percent. 

Phasing In New Actuarial and Asset Value Assumptions
PPA requires the use of actuarial and asset value assumptions that more precisely reflect a plan’s actual liabilities and investment experience. 

Pre-PPA: Plan sponsors calculated benefit liabilities using a discount rate chosen by the plan's actuary and a mortality table specified by the Treasury Depaartment.

Plans must now value their pension liabilities using three different rates based on a modified yield curve of investment-grade corporate bonds. The rates correspond to different time horizons for paying out plan benefits:

- A short-term rate is applied for benefits expected to be paid in the next five years.
- A medium rate is applied for benefits expected to be paid in five to 20 years.
- A long-term rate is applied for benefits expected to be paid after 20 years.

PPA and WRERA also seek to minimize problems of plan underfunding that occurred when the investment value of plan assets was overstated.

Pre-PPA: To help compensate for market fluctuations, plan assets were allowed to be “smoothed” by averaging their fair market value over a period of up to five years. 

Post-WRERA: Pension plans are allowed to “smooth” out their unexpected asset losses. The new law permits employers to “smooth” the value of pension plan assets over 24 months instead of having to apply the mathematical average that Treasury requires. This change will soften the accounting of 2008 plan losses.

Increased Deductible Contributions
To encourage faster funding, the PPA increases the maximum deductible contribution amount that plans may take. 

Pre-PPA: Employers were allowed a tax deduction for plan contributions up to 100 percent of a plan’s current funding liability. Contributions above that amount were subject to a 10
percent penalty tax.

Post-PPA: Beginning in 2008, deductible contributions may be made up to an amount equal to the funding target, normal costs and a “cushion account” equal to 50 percent of the target liability account, plus accountability for projected compensation over the value of the plan assets. 

Relief for Multi-employer Plans
WRERA also provides relief for multi-employer plans. 

Pre-WRERA: Plans in “endangered” or “critical status” were required to adopt a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan. 

Post-WRERA: While troubled plans must still adopt a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan, WRERA allows them to “freeze” their plan status for one year — effectively freezing for one year the terms of any funding improvement or rehabilitation plan adopted during the previous plan year.

Pre-WRERA: Plans were generally required to bring their funded position up to statutory standards within a correction period, typically 10 years or 15 years. 

Post-WRERA: Troubled plans may also extend their current funding improvement or rehabilitation periods for three years.

Next Steps
Plan sponsors should carefully evaluate these changes under the Pension Protection Act, as revised by the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act, to determine if plan administrative or funding changes are required.

If you have questions about the new funding rules or actuarial certification requirements, please contact Sonia Freeman or Michael Veuleman.